| |
Do non-technical Internal users really pose a hacking threat?
With all of the recent press
regarding the sharp rise in Internet-based external threats, is it any wonder that internal threats continue to
be overlooked? It is a fact that many companies today continue to focus the
majority of their budgets and effort on “external” penetration and Denial of
Service (DoS) risks. Regardless of the source you will consistently find that
the facts support how internal security breaches continue to lead external
breaches by a significant majority. In fact, the risk of “internal” attacks is
very likely to rise in the coming year due to the growth, sophistication, and
ease of use of hacking tools available on the Internet.
It has been common place for
many years that security professionals would communicate the vulnerabilities of
operating systems and network services, such as web, email, ftp, telnet, etc. to
the public in many forms. In order for would-be hackers or disgruntled
employees to take advantage of these published vulnerabilities, it would require
the individual to create application code or scripts after studying the notes of
a select group of experts who originally discovered and documented the
vulnerability. Taking advantage of these security holes would require a level
of knowledge beyond that of many common IT administrators and the very vast
majority of non-technical individuals. Hence, the most common threats from
non-technical internal employees have mostly been limited to a matter of
improperly managed permissions, weak authentication, and other
administrative-level issues.
Over the past year the number of
pre-coded exploit applications has been on the rise. The more sophisticated
hackers are now writing and publishing applications that non-technical
individuals can use on UNIX or Windows PCs. These exploit applications can scan
internal networks for vulnerable servers and then perform a specific exploit
against the selected target. The most common type of attack used by these new
applications is DoS attacks that crash production servers with little or no way
to track the source of the problem. Crashing a server is a very significant
issue since it not only affects productivity, but can also corrupt data causing
integrity issues. This is obviously a very serious issue and is rapidly
becoming more common in today’s corporate environments. The need for constant
attention to security patches and fixes, as well as an increased need for
internal auditing and/or intrusion detection systems is in order to combat this
issue.
Internal auditing is one
critical aspect of a security plan that can reduce the risk associated with
these new attack tools. However, many internal auditing projects, if they are
being done at all, primarily focus on high-level policy issues like weak
passwords, directory and file permissions, and disaster recovery procedures. In
many cases, it is only the external audits that commonly test for the actual
operating system and network service vulnerabilities being exploited by this new
age of hacking tools. It is vital that the IT management that evaluates
security auditing vendors be sure that internal auditing vendors provide a
comprehensive analysis of the operating system and application vulnerabilities.
Without this analysis, these new risks to business continuance and data
integrity may go undetected until they directly affect the bottom line.
Many managers assume that
non-technical employees do not pose a significant risk to business continuance
from an information security standpoint. Unfortunately, because of the easy
access to more sophisticated exploit tools that assumption is costing business
today in terms of service outages and lost revenue. Know your risks and
remediation requires by performing an internal audit before your company becomes
the next victim.
|
|

| Find out how the professionals at BAI Security
can help you secure your business. Contact Us Today »
|
|