Risk Management in 2008 - Top 10 Considerations
1) Keeping up with
Compliance
What if you find your
organization already maxed out in terms of physical and/or financial resources
to achieve compliance? This is a
major issue for some financial institutions, especially the smaller ones.
“With Banking and Finance
being a major market sector for BAI Security, we speak with a large number of
financial institutions and many are struggling with compliance.” says Michael
Bruck, President of BAI Security, a leading Managed Security Services firm based
in Chicago. “Of course, the smallest
organizations are hardest hit, but we’re seeing institutions of all sizes
struggling to revise and expand budgets to allow for new technology and
personnel.”
Historically, the Credit
Union National Association finds that only about 10 percent of credit unions
have a person dedicated to compliance.
The others generally rely on a senior officer to handle this area – on
top of their other non-security responsibilities.
Security is too often put lower on the priority list and this causes
shortcomings in their security program and obvious increased risks to the
organization.
However, it’s not just the
smaller credit unions that face these issues, as pointed out by Mr. Bruck.
Small and medium sized banks are also facing challenges in redirecting
funds and resources from an already overburdened IT department.
The consensus for this issue
seems to be doing more with less.
This isn’t to say pile more on your already overburdened personnel, but spend
smarter and take advantage of economies of scale.
The amazing growth of IT outsourcing, specifically in security, is by and
large driven by demand. This demand
in-part is coming from organizations that have learned to do more with less and
are succeeding.
2) New Regulations
As if the current regulatory
requirements were not enough, here is a sampling of what to expect in 2008:
·
ID Theft
Red Flags – compliance deadline is November 1st.
·
New FFIEC
Requirements – update to the IT Examiners Handbook is expected in 2008
·
FFIEC
Pandemic guidance – potentially the biggest business continuity issue of
2008
·
FDIC IT
Risk Management Program amendments – the new exam questionnaire is out and
it deals with new issues such as vendor management.
You can only expect other regulators to follow suit.
·
Anti-Money
Laundering – the Bank Secrecy Act examination manual was revised in 07’ and
there’s every reason to expect new requirements in 2008
·
BASEL II
– As banking institutions domore business internationally, then increasingly
they must meet these recommended global banking standards.
Whether you institution is
working toward compliance on ID Theft Red Flags or the recently released FFIEC
Pandemic Guidance, “Make sure your risk assessments are current and up-to-date,”
says FDIC spokesperson David Barr.
3) Insider Threats
“One of the areas we see a
dramatic increase of concern is over data leakage,” says Michael Bruck of
Chicago-based BAI Security. “The
ease in which an individual can export sensitive information from an internal
network is chilling for many institutions.
We often conduct such evaluations during our Security Audit program and
demonstrate just how easy and undetectable the process can be in most
environments.” Even with the
headlines and various forms of education on this subject, BAI Security recently
reported that as many as 40% of institutions responded in a recent survey that
they were concerned their organization has been a victim of data leakage.
As noted by many security
experts, you can’t detect what you’re not monitoring for on your network.
“The technology exists today and is used in our Managed Security
Services,” as Mr. Bruck points out “that monitor, detect and even block
sensitive information going out of the organization within a wide-range of
applications. We are also monitoring
and/or controlling where users can store information off-site for many
organizations.”
The key here seems to be that
more monitoring is greatly needed in order to curtail this activity.
4) Identity Theft
It’s the fastest growing
crime in America, with 27.3 million victims in the past five years and nearly 20
million in the past two years alone.
The entire industry most answer how they are protecting customer information.
Institutions need better mechanisms to verify new account openings,
especially in the online environment.
Institutions also need to
work closely with local law enforcement to fight indentify thieves.
Further cooperation between public and private sectors "is the only way
that we, as a society, can fight identity theft," says Identity Theft Assistance
Center's President Anne Wallace.
Wallace notes there have been
positive steps:
·
Recommendations by the White House Task Force on
Identity Theft;
·
Growth of state and regional task forces devoted
to identity theft;
·
Initiative by Bank of America and the
International Association of Police Chiefs to provide new tools for local law
enforcement;
·
Institutions also have been urged by regulators
and the ID Theft task force to reduce the use of social security numbers as
identifiers for customer accounts.
For 2008, institutions can
expect to see a continued increase in identity thefts through financial fraud.
Individuals will see personal information leaked over the Internet through blogs
and personal web sites. Personal identifying information will be posted, traded,
sold over the Internet, instant messaging, internet relay chat, (IRC), and other
electronic platforms, as well as social networking sites.
5) Data Breaches Caused
by Human Error
"We have met the enemy and he
is us," was the statement made by the comic strip character Pogo near the end of
the Vietnam War. The unaware employee, consultant, contractor or third party
service provider staffer is an institution's worst enemy.
To avoid becoming the
industry's version of a TJX-level data breach, institutions need to develop
corporate policies that protect the organization from employees' electronic
behavior occurring outside the corporate perimeter.
Away from the protected
network, users are more vulnerable and less secure. Human error can lead to
leaking sensitive information on blogs, instant messenger, through chat rooms
and texting. Inadvertent human error is a constant and will continue to
contribute to lost laptops, PDAs, and other sensitive equipment.
Dennis Gorges, Corporate
Compliance Officer at Industry service provider Jack Henry sees the human cause
of data breaches broken down into three types:
·
Intentional (malicious);
·
Unintentional (they should know better)
·
Accidental (lost tapes).
Financial institutions need
to develop robust incident response and privacy breach management programs, and
need to include all levels of the enterprise, include everyone in the planning
and testing, so that when a breach occurs, everyone knows what to do.
FDIC's Barr also cautions
institutions should ensure they are in compliance with other government agencies
requirements (GSA and OEM have certain data breach requirements). "Institutions
should be looking at those to make sure they are in compliance if they did
experience some sort of a breach," Barr says.
6) Business Continuity –
Pandemic Planning
For the past three years,
financial institutions have heard the buzz about the possibility of a pandemic.
In 2007, institutions saw more action by the Department of Homeland Security,
federal banking regulators and the industry organizations charged with planning
the industry's preparation for a pandemic. The Fall 2007 industry-wide pandemic
test showed that institutions are readying their staff and operations for a
pandemic. Bad news is that not enough has been done, according to the
self-assessment survey conducted after the three week event.
The second set of FFIEC
guidance on pandemic planning was released at the end of 2007, and institutions
can expect that their regulators will ask about their pandemic plan and will
want to see it as part of an overall BCP/DR plan for the institution. Roger
Blake, Senior Information Systems Officer at the NCUA's Division of Supervision,
says from an IT perspective regulators will start the year with enhanced focus
on BCP and pandemic planning.
Elements to include in your
institution's pandemic plan include a preventive program to reduce the
pandemic's impact on operations; a comprehensive framework of facilities,
systems and procedures to continue critical operations if large numbers of staff
are unavailable for extended periods; testing of the plan and oversight to
ensure timely updates; and ongoing review of the institution's pandemic plan.
7) PCI Compliance; Debit
Card Fraud Protection
Complying with the 'digital
dozen,' or the Payment Card Industry's 12 requirements for data protection, is a
challenge for most financial institutions. But the price of not complying with
PCI is costly -- just ask the TJX Companies, which settled the first of several
court cases that may cost the global retailer upward of $500 million. Compliance
with the PCI Data Security Standards means that your institution is better
prepared to protect not only credit card data, but the rest of your
institution's information.
With losses mounting into the
billions (Gartner reported $2.75 billion lost to debit card fraud in 2005) the
securing of your customer's cash needs technology solutions. One example is the
Bank of America offer to notify a customer when a transaction has taken place,
or alert them to any suspicious charges or changes to their account via email as
soon as they occur.
8) Employee and Customer
Awareness Training
It's something everyone
intends to do - better educate their employees and customers about the security
threats that are facing institutions and customers. Now with the ID Theft Red
Flags, it's also been pushed to the top of the compliance list. Institutions by
Nov. 1 must have a written program showing how they are educating their
employees and customers about identity theft.
American Banker Association's
Doug Johnson, senior policy advisor for the largest industry association, lists
this as one of the top risk management issues for 2008."Increasing your
institution's security awareness pays off in several ways -- employees learn how
to protect the data they're working with, and their awareness reduces the threat
of the insider threat (either malicious or unintentional)," says Johnson. Many
times the malicious insider can be stopped, if the people working with them are
trained and are aware of the red flags that show the work habits and behaviors
of a malicious insider. Do your employees know what to look for, what indicators
there are that an insider is doing something on your networks or to your
institution's data?
Bentz at Sandy Spring Bank
plans to enhance the security awareness program for clients and employees. "It
is an ongoing effort to educate employees and clients on risk and protection,"
he says.
9) Criminal Attacks
With the increased number of
online attacks against financial institutions in 2007, including more
sophisticated phishing and other types of criminal attacks aimed at both
institutions and their customers, the coming year looks to be more of the same.
In January 2007, the internet
criminals hit users worldwide with the Storm botnet. Because of such types of
attacks, security analysts predict online banking services need to be better
secured. One example of this from the late 2007 is the case of an unnamed bank
in the Midwest that hired a firm to perform a penetration test against its
online banking site. The penetration testers took only five minutes to crack
into the site with a fairly well-known type of SQL injection attack.
"We're going to see the usual
list of suspects in 2008, in the fraud space particularly, with the evolving
nature of fraud, phishing continues to evolve," says Aite's Weber. "Financial
institutions are certainly instituting measures to stop phishing; it's difficult
to rein in those customers who are perhaps still prone to phishing or pharming
and are still giving out their personal information."
On the horizon also looms a
new type of sophisticated Trojan, says FDIC's Barr. "There are some newer
'banker' Trojans that can really attack systems. And they're difficult to track
and identify. So institutions should come up with some sort of a game plan to
protect their systems."
In addition to traditional
phishing attacks, institutions also need to prepare for malware-based attacks.
This type of attack distributes malicious content to unsuspecting users through
Web site visits and nefarious downloads.
Institutions are also
cautioned to protect their high-end customers and their senior officers from
individual targeted attacks. With so much available data on the Internet, CEOs
and other individuals put themselves at risk for cyber and physical threats by
protesters, activists and political groups. The internet has made it easier to
access information about individuals, making them more accessible targets.
10) Managing Third-Party
Risk
The FDIC sees vendor
management as a trend important enough to include in its updated IT Risk
Management Program Examination Procedures questionnaire in December 2007. Other
banking industry regulators are also expected to look more closely at how their
regulated institutions are managing their third-party service providers, and how
strenuously they are examining the vendor's information security program and
data protection strategies.
Responding to known and new
security risks posed by using third parties is key, says Aite analyst Weber.
Knowing what your outsourcers are handling, and being aware of how they are
protecting the data in their care is paramount to security, she notes.
For institutions that have
slogged through innumerable questionnaires and onsite audit requests to vet
their third-party service providers, the pilot of the Financial Institution
Shared Assessments Program (FISAP), a shared assessment program by several of
the largest financial institutions under the aegis of the Financial Services
Roundtable and BITs.org, offers hope. The FISAP, once fully operational, will
reduce the need for individual assessments of service provider's, enhances
members' internal risk analysis processes, and will allow financial
institution's to align service provider testing with industry regulations.
|